tests.nixpkgs-check-by-name: Minor improvements from review

4 files changed, 24 insertions, 19 deletions

diff --git a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/eval.rs b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/eval.rs
index 927e446b452f3..20652d9ede263 100644
--- a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/eval.rs
+++ b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/eval.rs
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ enum AttributeVariant {
 pub fn check_values(
     nixpkgs_path: &Path,
     package_names: Vec<String>,
-    eval_accessible_paths: &Vec<&Path>,
+    eval_accessible_paths: &[&Path],
 ) -> validation::Result<version::Nixpkgs> {
     // Write the list of packages we need to check into a temporary JSON file.
     // This can then get read by the Nix evaluation.
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ pub fn check_values(
         ))?;
 
     Ok(
-        validation::sequence(package_names.iter().map(|package_name| {
-            let relative_package_file = structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name);
+        validation::sequence(package_names.into_iter().map(|package_name| {
+            let relative_package_file = structure::relative_file_for_package(&package_name);
             let absolute_package_file = nixpkgs_path.join(&relative_package_file);
 
-            if let Some(attribute_info) = actual_files.get(package_name) {
+            if let Some(attribute_info) = actual_files.get(&package_name) {
                 let check_result = if !attribute_info.is_derivation {
                     NixpkgsProblem::NonDerivation {
                         relative_package_file: relative_package_file.clone(),
diff --git a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/main.rs b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/main.rs
index 91e1992a52c9e..ee73ffbd0f8d0 100644
--- a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/main.rs
+++ b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/main.rs
@@ -31,12 +31,7 @@ pub struct Args {
 
 fn main() -> ExitCode {
     let args = Args::parse();
-    match process(
-        args.base.as_deref(),
-        &args.nixpkgs,
-        &vec![],
-        &mut io::stderr(),
-    ) {
+    match process(args.base.as_deref(), &args.nixpkgs, &[], &mut io::stderr()) {
         Ok(true) => {
             eprintln!("{}", "Validated successfully".green());
             ExitCode::SUCCESS
@@ -69,10 +64,10 @@ fn main() -> ExitCode {
 pub fn process<W: io::Write>(
     base_nixpkgs: Option<&Path>,
     main_nixpkgs: &Path,
-    eval_accessible_paths: &Vec<&Path>,
+    eval_accessible_paths: &[&Path],
     error_writer: &mut W,
 ) -> anyhow::Result<bool> {
-    let main_result = check_nixpkgs(main_nixpkgs, eval_accessible_paths)?;
+    let main_result = check_nixpkgs(main_nixpkgs, eval_accessible_paths, error_writer)?;
     let check_result = main_result.result_map(|nixpkgs_version| {
         if let Some(base) = base_nixpkgs {
             check_nixpkgs(base, eval_accessible_paths, error_writer)?.result_map(
@@ -99,11 +94,17 @@ pub fn process<W: io::Write>(
     }
 }
 
-/// Checks whether the pkgs/by-name structure in Nixpkgs is valid,
-/// and returns to which degree it's valid for checks with increased strictness.
-pub fn check_nixpkgs(
+/// Checks whether the pkgs/by-name structure in Nixpkgs is valid.
+///
+/// This does not include checks that depend on the base version of Nixpkgs to compare against,
+/// which is used for checks that were only introduced later and increased strictness.
+///
+/// Instead a `version::Nixpkgs` is returned, whose `compare` method allows comparing the
+/// result of this function for the base Nixpkgs against the one for the main Nixpkgs.
+pub fn check_nixpkgs<W: io::Write>(
     nixpkgs_path: &Path,
-    eval_accessible_paths: &Vec<&Path>,
+    eval_accessible_paths: &[&Path],
+    error_writer: &mut W,
 ) -> validation::Result<version::Nixpkgs> {
     Ok({
         let nixpkgs_path = nixpkgs_path.canonicalize().context(format!(
@@ -112,10 +113,11 @@ pub fn check_nixpkgs(
         ))?;
 
         if !nixpkgs_path.join(utils::BASE_SUBPATH).exists() {
-            eprintln!(
+            writeln!(
+                error_writer,
                 "Given Nixpkgs path does not contain a {} subdirectory, no check necessary.",
                 utils::BASE_SUBPATH
-            );
+            )?;
             Success(version::Nixpkgs::default())
         } else {
             check_structure(&nixpkgs_path)?.result_map(|package_names|
@@ -224,7 +226,7 @@ mod tests {
         // We don't want coloring to mess up the tests
         let writer = temp_env::with_var("NO_COLOR", Some("1"), || -> anyhow::Result<_> {
             let mut writer = vec![];
-            process(base_nixpkgs, &path, &vec![&extra_nix_path], &mut writer)
+            process(base_nixpkgs, &path, &[&extra_nix_path], &mut writer)
                 .context(format!("Failed test case {name}"))?;
             Ok(writer)
         })?;
diff --git a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/version.rs b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/version.rs
index c5cee95e0d53d..c82f537c504b8 100644
--- a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/version.rs
+++ b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/version.rs
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ impl Nixpkgs {
     /// Compares two Nixpkgs versions against each other, returning validation errors only if the
     /// `from` version satisfied the stricter checks, while the `to` version doesn't satisfy them
     /// anymore.
+    /// This enables a gradual transition from weaker to stricter checks, by only allowing PRs to
+    /// increase strictness.
     pub fn compare(optional_from: Option<Self>, to: Self) -> Validation<()> {
         validation::sequence_(
             // We only loop over the current attributes,
diff --git a/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/no-by-name/expected b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/no-by-name/expected
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..ddcb2df46e5fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/no-by-name/expected
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Given Nixpkgs path does not contain a pkgs/by-name subdirectory, no check necessary.