| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[Motivation](NixOS#257817 (comment))
`extraLayouts` was missed in #259891, so moving it to the other xkb
options with this PR.
Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <49727155+katexochen@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
[Motivation](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/257817#issuecomment-1741705042):
- Having all the XKB options in the same attribute set clarifies their
relation better than using a common option name prefix ("xkb").
- `services.xserver.layout` is an XKB option, but this is not obvious
from its name. Putting it with the other XKB options clarifies this.
Co-authored-by: Michele Guerini Rocco <rnhmjoj@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
When test-input-reader runs, it's standard input exists and will
be buffered, so by the time the file exists, the standard input
can already be written to.
I have no reason to believe that a terminal emulator would start
accepting input _after_ launching the command.
I've tested this for hours in a loop without a single failure or
timeout.
|
|
I've run this test on repeat for hours, so there's reason to be
hopeful.
|
|
Avoids blocking on stdout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit f1987fb58f57828944ca822bbb39b3de87f01863 renamed colemak/en-latin9 to
colemak/colemak, but the keymap test wasn't adjusted to refer to the new path.
|
|
This way, the package set will be possible to pass without re-importing
all the time
|
|
xdotool failed in rare cases when a window was already created
but not yet decorated by the window manager.
also prevent a (never observed but possible) race condition
|
|
simplify tests, prevent timeouts and non-deterministic failures
|
|
The test doesn't use OCR, so we actually don't need an OCR-friendly
theme here.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had the basic version of this laying around for some while but didn't
continue on it. Originally it was for testing support for the Neo layout
introduced back then (8cd6d53).
We only test the first three Neo layers, because the last three layers
are largely comprised of special characters and in addition to that the
support for the VT keymap seems to be limited compared to the Xorg
keymap.
Yesterday @NicolasPetton on IRC had troubles with the Colemak layout
(IRC logs: http://nixos.org/irc/logs/log.20160330, starting at 16:08)
and I found that test again, so I went for improving and adding to
<nixpkgs>.
While the original problem seemed to be related to GDM, we can still add
another subtest that checks whether GDM correctly applies the keyboard
layout. However I don't have a clue how to properly configure the
keyboard layout on GDM, at least not within the NixOS configuration.
The main goal of this test is not to test a complete set of all key
mappings but to check whether the keymap is loaded and working at all.
It also serves as an example for NixOS keyboard configurations.
The list of keyboard layouts is by no means complete, so everybody is
free to add their own to the test or improve the existing ones.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
