| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As mentioned in the previous commit, kernel patches from
boot.kernelPatches are added to the kernel package via .override.
Unfortunately, .override overrides the function arguments of the
expression referenced from callPackage, so having the patches inside the
package expression itself will discard those patches once there is an
override.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit e27c4cdfbe994a259b77cb4f71c1746552f639f3.
I was wrong about this patch being applied upstream, but it turns out
that somehow both of these patches are opplied twice, so we'll need to
deduplicate the patch list or even better not introduce these duplicates
in the first place.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch doesn't apply because it is already included upstream.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removed in NixOS/nixpkgs@b3f7d626c164ae591a067f78bfcbb06fc3a588b9.
We are currently stuck in 4.7 with the T100HA because of this upstream
bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97529
So let's bring back the expression for Linux 4.7 until there is time for
debugging the mentioned bug.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
|
|
This now should reflect "all things kernel" and thus could not only
contain patches but other things. If we have so many patches that it
makes sense to namespace them further, we can still use kernel/patches
for that purpose which is way better than "kpatches".
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
