| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
similar to writeScript, but writes an execline instead. Should be
upstreams to `lib.writers` sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It’s conventional that these tools have the form
tool name options data
so we should adhere to that.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can auto-escape execlines correctly if we model them as nix-style
lists, so we shoud certainly do so. It also helps abstraction.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reference files in `bin` outputs for a derivation as an attribute set,
with renaming capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improves the “execline experience” and adds some basic tests.
The idea is that the final result doesn’t use coreutils and provides a
feasible alternative to bash-based tooling.
|
|
* runExecline: like runCommand, but a lot more lightweight
* symlink: symlink a given list of links together
* importer: a small DSL to “import” “modules” into a build context
Some highlights:
* runExecline does not use any stdenv (apart from the `execline` build)
* symlink uses netstrings to pass correct fields into the derivation
* no use of bash, everything uses execline.
|